Luxembourg vs Portugal: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Portugal
1
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Portugal rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Portugal
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1 against 1 in Portugal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 111 shared years of data; in 1915 it was Portugal ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Portugal Difference Ahead
1910s 0.2 0 0.2 Luxembourg
1920s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1930s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1940s 0.4 0 0.4 Luxembourg
1950s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1960s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
1970s 1 0.4 0.6 Luxembourg
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Luxembourg or Portugal?
Luxembourg, at 1 against 1 in Portugal as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Luxembourg and Portugal?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Portugal?
111 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Portugal rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.