Luxembourg vs Montenegro: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Luxembourg
1
in 2025
Montenegro
1
in 2025
Luxembourg rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Luxembourg
  • Montenegro
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Luxembourg currently reports 1 against 1 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 31 shared years of data; in 1915 it was Montenegro ahead.

Luxembourg ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Luxembourg has averaged higher in every one of the 5 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Luxembourg Montenegro Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0
1990s 1 0 1 Luxembourg
2000s 1 0.6 0.4 Luxembourg
2010s 1 0.3 0.7 Luxembourg
2020s 1 0.8333 0.1667 Luxembourg

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Luxembourg or Montenegro?
Luxembourg, at 1 against 1 in Montenegro as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Luxembourg and Montenegro?
0, with Luxembourg ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Luxembourg and Montenegro?
31 years are reported by both, from 1915 to 2025.
How do Luxembourg and Montenegro rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Luxembourg ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.