Lithuania vs South Africa: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Lithuania
1
in 2025
South Africa
1
in 2025
Lithuania rank
1st
South Africa rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Lithuania
  • South Africa
00.20.40.60.81179519102025

How they compare

Lithuania currently reports 1 against 1 in South Africa, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was South Africa ahead.

Lithuania ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Lithuania has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania South Africa Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0.6 0 0.6 Lithuania
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 1 0.5 0.5 Lithuania
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Lithuania or South Africa?
Lithuania, at 1 against 1 in South Africa as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Lithuania and South Africa?
0, with Lithuania ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and South Africa?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Lithuania and South Africa rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Lithuania ranks 1st and South Africa ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.