Lebanon vs Thailand: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Lebanon
0
in 2025
Thailand
0
in 2025
Lebanon rank
87th
Thailand rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Lebanon
  • Thailand
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Lebanon currently reports 0 against 0 in Thailand, a difference of 0.

Across all 107 years both countries report, Thailand has been ahead every year.

Lebanon ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Thailand has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lebanon Thailand Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.2 0.2 Thailand
2000s 0 0.6 0.6 Thailand
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Lebanon or Thailand?
Lebanon, at 0 against 0 in Thailand as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Lebanon and Thailand?
0, with Lebanon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lebanon and Thailand?
107 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Lebanon and Thailand rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Lebanon ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.