Kyrgyzstan vs Niger: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Kyrgyzstan
0
in 2025
Niger
0
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
87th
Niger rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Niger
00.20.40.60.81187619502025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 against 0 in Niger, a difference of 0.

Across all 104 years both countries report, Niger has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th and Niger ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Niger has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Niger Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.3 0.3 Niger
2000s 0 0.9 0.9 Niger
2010s 0 0.9 0.9 Niger
2020s 0 0.5 0.5 Niger

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Kyrgyzstan or Niger?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0 against 0 in Niger as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Kyrgyzstan and Niger?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Niger?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Niger rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th and Niger ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.