Kyrgyzstan vs Mexico: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Kyrgyzstan
0
in 2025
Mexico
0
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
87th
Mexico rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mexico
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 against 0 in Mexico, a difference of 0.

Across all 150 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th and Mexico ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 16 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Mexico Difference Ahead
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.4 0.4 Mexico
2000s 0 1 1 Mexico
2010s 0 1 1 Mexico
2020s 0 0.6667 0.6667 Mexico

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Kyrgyzstan or Mexico?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0 against 0 in Mexico as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mexico?
150 years are reported by both, from 1876 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Mexico rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th and Mexico ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.