Kyrgyzstan vs Mali: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Kyrgyzstan
0
in 2025
Mali
0
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan rank
87th
Mali rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Kyrgyzstan
  • Mali
00.20.40.60.81187619502025

How they compare

Kyrgyzstan currently reports 0 against 0 in Mali, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th and Mali ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kyrgyzstan Mali Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.7 0.7 Mali
2000s 0 1 1 Mali
2010s 0 0.8 0.8 Mali
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Kyrgyzstan or Mali?
Kyrgyzstan, at 0 against 0 in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Kyrgyzstan and Mali?
0, with Kyrgyzstan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kyrgyzstan and Mali?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Kyrgyzstan and Mali rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th and Mali ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.