Kuwait vs Kyrgyzstan: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Kuwait
0
in 2025
Kyrgyzstan
0
in 2025
Kuwait rank
87th
Kyrgyzstan rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Kuwait
  • Kyrgyzstan
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Kuwait currently reports 0 against 0 in Kyrgyzstan, a difference of 0.

Across all 150 years both countries report, Kyrgyzstan has been ahead every year.

Kuwait ranks 87th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Kuwait Kyrgyzstan Difference Ahead
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Kuwait or Kyrgyzstan?
Kuwait, at 0 against 0 in Kyrgyzstan as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan?
0, with Kuwait ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan?
150 years are reported by both, from 1876 to 2025.
How do Kuwait and Kyrgyzstan rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Kuwait ranks 87th and Kyrgyzstan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.