Japan vs Sri Lanka: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Japan
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Japan rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Japan
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Japan currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Japan ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Japan averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Japan Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.2 0.2 Sri Lanka
1950s 0.8 1 0.2 Sri Lanka
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 0.3 0.7 Japan
1990s 1 0.5 0.5 Japan
2000s 1 0.3 0.7 Japan
2010s 1 0.5 0.5 Japan
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Japan or Sri Lanka?
Japan, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Japan and Sri Lanka?
0, with Japan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Japan and Sri Lanka?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Japan and Sri Lanka rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Japan ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.