Jamaica vs Sri Lanka: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Jamaica
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Jamaica rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Jamaica
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Jamaica ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 4 and Sri Lanka in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.2 0.2 Sri Lanka
1950s 0.4 1 0.6 Sri Lanka
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 0.7 1 0.3 Sri Lanka
1980s 0.6 0.3 0.3 Jamaica
1990s 1 0.5 0.5 Jamaica
2000s 1 0.3 0.7 Jamaica
2010s 1 0.5 0.5 Jamaica
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Jamaica or Sri Lanka?
Jamaica, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
0, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Sri Lanka?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Sri Lanka rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Jamaica ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.