Jamaica vs Senegal: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Jamaica
1
in 2025
Senegal
1
in 2025
Jamaica rank
1st
Senegal rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Jamaica
  • Senegal
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1 against 1 in Senegal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 122 shared years of data; in 1904 it was Senegal ahead.

Jamaica ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Jamaica has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Senegal Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.4 0 0.4 Jamaica
1960s 1 0 1 Jamaica
1970s 0.7 0 0.7 Jamaica
1980s 0.6 0 0.6 Jamaica
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Jamaica or Senegal?
Jamaica, at 1 against 1 in Senegal as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Jamaica and Senegal?
0, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Senegal?
122 years are reported by both, from 1904 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Senegal rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Jamaica ranks 1st and Senegal ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.