Jamaica vs Portugal: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Jamaica
1
in 2025
Portugal
1
in 2025
Jamaica rank
1st
Portugal rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Jamaica
  • Portugal
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Jamaica currently reports 1 against 1 in Portugal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Portugal ahead.

Jamaica ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Jamaica averaged higher in 3 and Portugal in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Jamaica Portugal Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.4 0 0.4 Jamaica
1960s 1 0 1 Jamaica
1970s 0.7 0.4 0.3 Jamaica
1980s 0.6 1 0.4 Portugal
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Jamaica or Portugal?
Jamaica, at 1 against 1 in Portugal as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Jamaica and Portugal?
0, with Jamaica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Jamaica and Portugal?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Jamaica and Portugal rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Jamaica ranks 1st and Portugal ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.