Italy vs Sri Lanka: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Italy
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Italy rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Italy
  • Sri Lanka
00.20.40.60.81181519202025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Sri Lanka ahead.

Italy ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Sri Lanka Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.3 0.2 0.1 Italy
1950s 1 1 0 β€”
1960s 1 1 0 β€”
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 0.3 0.7 Italy
1990s 1 0.5 0.5 Italy
2000s 1 0.3 0.7 Italy
2010s 1 0.5 0.5 Italy
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Italy or Sri Lanka?
Italy, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Italy and Sri Lanka?
0, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Sri Lanka?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Italy and Sri Lanka rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Italy ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.