Italy vs Solomon Islands: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Italy
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Italy rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Italy
  • Solomon Islands
00.20.40.60.81181519202025

How they compare

Italy currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Italy ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Italy Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0.3 0 0.3 Italy
1950s 1 0 1 Italy
1960s 1 0 1 Italy
1970s 1 0.1 0.9 Italy
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 0.7 0.3 Italy
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Italy or Solomon Islands?
Italy, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Italy and Solomon Islands?
0, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Italy and Solomon Islands?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Italy and Solomon Islands rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Italy ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.