Iraq vs South Sudan: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Iraq
0
in 2025
South Sudan
0
in 2025
Iraq rank
87th
South Sudan rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Iraq
  • South Sudan
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Iraq currently reports 0 against 0 in South Sudan, a difference of 0.

Across all 190 years both countries report, South Sudan has been ahead every year.

Iraq ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iraq South Sudan Difference Ahead
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1830s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Iraq or South Sudan?
Iraq, at 0 against 0 in South Sudan as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Iraq and South Sudan?
0, with Iraq ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iraq and South Sudan?
190 years are reported by both, from 1821 to 2025.
How do Iraq and South Sudan rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Iraq ranks 87th and South Sudan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.