India vs Papua New Guinea: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

India
0
in 2025
Papua New Guinea
0
in 2025
India rank
87th
Papua New Guinea rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • India
  • Papua New Guinea
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

India currently reports 0 against 0 in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

India ranks 87th and Papua New Guinea ranks 87th of 176 countries.

India has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade India Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0.8 0 0.8 India
1960s 1 0 1 India
1970s 0.7 0.7 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 India
2010s 0.7 0 0.7 India
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, India or Papua New Guinea?
India, at 0 against 0 in Papua New Guinea as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between India and Papua New Guinea?
0, with India ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for India and Papua New Guinea?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do India and Papua New Guinea rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
India ranks 87th and Papua New Guinea ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.