Iceland vs North Macedonia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Iceland
1
in 2025
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Iceland rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Iceland
  • North Macedonia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 1 against 1 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 123 shared years of data; in 1900 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Iceland ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1900s 0.6 0 0.6 Iceland
1910s 1 0 1 Iceland
1920s 1 0 1 Iceland
1930s 1 0 1 Iceland
1940s 1 0 1 Iceland
1950s 1 0 1 Iceland
1960s 1 0 1 Iceland
1970s 1 0 1 Iceland
1980s 1 0 1 Iceland
1990s 1 0.2 0.8 Iceland
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 Iceland
2010s 1 0.4 0.6 Iceland
2020s 1 1 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Iceland or North Macedonia?
Iceland, at 1 against 1 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Iceland and North Macedonia?
0, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and North Macedonia?
123 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Iceland and North Macedonia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Iceland ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.