Haiti vs Singapore: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Haiti
0
in 2025
Singapore
0
in 2025
Haiti rank
87th
Singapore rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Haiti
  • Singapore
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Haiti currently reports 0 against 0 in Singapore, a difference of 0.

Across all 158 years both countries report, Singapore has been ahead every year.

Haiti ranks 87th and Singapore ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Haiti Singapore Difference Ahead
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0 0 β€”
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Haiti or Singapore?
Haiti, at 0 against 0 in Singapore as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Haiti and Singapore?
0, with Haiti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Haiti and Singapore?
158 years are reported by both, from 1868 to 2025.
How do Haiti and Singapore rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Haiti ranks 87th and Singapore ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.