Guinea-Bissau vs Ukraine: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Ukraine
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
87th
Ukraine rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Ukraine
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Ukraine, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 80 shared years of data; in 1946 it was Ukraine ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Ukraine ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Ukraine in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Ukraine Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.6 0.6 Ukraine
2000s 0 0.4 0.4 Ukraine
2010s 0.3 0.1 0.2 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.3333 0.3333 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Guinea-Bissau or Ukraine?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Ukraine as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Guinea-Bissau and Ukraine?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Ukraine?
80 years are reported by both, from 1946 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Ukraine rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Ukraine ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.