Guinea-Bissau vs Thailand: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Thailand
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
87th
Thailand rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Thailand
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Thailand, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Thailand ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 2 and Thailand in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Thailand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Thailand |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Thailand |
| 2010s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 0.3333 | 0 | 0.3333 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Guinea-Bissau or Thailand?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Thailand as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Guinea-Bissau and Thailand?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Thailand?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Thailand rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Thailand ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.