Guinea-Bissau vs Pakistan: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Pakistan
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
87th
Pakistan rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Pakistan
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Pakistan, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Pakistan ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Pakistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Pakistan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.3 | 0 | 0.3 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 0.3333 | 0 | 0.3333 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Guinea-Bissau or Pakistan?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Pakistan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Guinea-Bissau and Pakistan?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Pakistan?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Pakistan rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Pakistan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.