Guinea-Bissau vs Mexico: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Mexico
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
87th
Mexico rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Mexico
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Mexico, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Mexico has been ahead every year.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Mexico ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Mexico has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Mexico | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | Mexico |
| 2000s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mexico |
| 2010s | 0.3 | 1 | 0.7 | Mexico |
| 2020s | 0.3333 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | Mexico |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Guinea-Bissau or Mexico?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Mexico as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Guinea-Bissau and Mexico?
- 0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Mexico?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Mexico rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Mexico ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.