Guinea-Bissau vs Lebanon: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Lebanon
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau rank
87th
Lebanon rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Guinea-Bissau
  • Lebanon
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 0 against 0 in Lebanon, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 107 shared years of data; in 1919 it was Lebanon ahead.

Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Lebanon ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Guinea-Bissau Lebanon Difference Ahead
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0.3 0 0.3 Guinea-Bissau
2020s 0.3333 0 0.3333 Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Guinea-Bissau or Lebanon?
Guinea-Bissau, at 0 against 0 in Lebanon as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Guinea-Bissau and Lebanon?
0, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Lebanon?
107 years are reported by both, from 1919 to 2025.
How do Guinea-Bissau and Lebanon rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th and Lebanon ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.