Ghana vs Solomon Islands: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Ghana
1
in 2025
Solomon Islands
1
in 2025
Ghana rank
1st
Solomon Islands rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Ghana
  • Solomon Islands
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 124 shared years of data; in 1902 it was Solomon Islands ahead.

Ghana ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 1 and Solomon Islands in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana Solomon Islands Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0.1 0.1 Solomon Islands
1980s 0.1 1 0.9 Solomon Islands
1990s 0.4 1 0.6 Solomon Islands
2000s 1 0.7 0.3 Ghana
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Ghana or Solomon Islands?
Ghana, at 1 against 1 in Solomon Islands as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Ghana and Solomon Islands?
0, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Solomon Islands?
124 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
How do Ghana and Solomon Islands rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Ghana ranks 1st and Solomon Islands ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.