Ghana vs North Macedonia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Ghana
1
in 2025
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Ghana rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Ghana
  • North Macedonia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Ghana currently reports 1 against 1 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 121 shared years of data; in 1902 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Ghana ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Ghana has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ghana North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0.1 0 0.1 Ghana
1990s 0.4 0.2 0.2 Ghana
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 Ghana
2010s 1 0.4 0.6 Ghana
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Ghana or North Macedonia?
Ghana, at 1 against 1 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Ghana and North Macedonia?
0, with Ghana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and North Macedonia?
121 years are reported by both, from 1902 to 2025.
How do Ghana and North Macedonia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Ghana ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.