Georgia vs United Arab Emirates: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Georgia
0
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
0
in 2025
Georgia rank
87th
United Arab Emirates rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Georgia
  • United Arab Emirates
00.20.40.60.81180119132025

How they compare

Georgia currently reports 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 55 shared years of data; in 1971 it was United Arab Emirates ahead.

Georgia ranks 87th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia United Arab Emirates Difference Ahead
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0.4 0 0.4 Georgia
2010s 0.8 0 0.8 Georgia
2020s 0.6667 0 0.6667 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Georgia or United Arab Emirates?
Georgia, at 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
0, with Georgia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and United Arab Emirates?
55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
How do Georgia and United Arab Emirates rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Georgia ranks 87th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.