Georgia vs Philippines: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Georgia
0
in 2025
Philippines
0
in 2025
Georgia rank
87th
Philippines rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Georgia
- Philippines
How they compare
Georgia currently reports 0 against 0 in Philippines, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Philippines ahead.
Georgia ranks 87th and Philippines ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Georgia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Philippines |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Philippines |
| 2000s | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0.8 | 0.6 | 0.2 | Georgia |
| 2020s | 0.6667 | 0 | 0.6667 | Georgia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Georgia or Philippines?
- Georgia, at 0 against 0 in Philippines as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Georgia and Philippines?
- 0, with Georgia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Philippines?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Georgia and Philippines rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Georgia ranks 87th and Philippines ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.