Gambia vs Vanuatu: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Gambia
1
in 2025
Vanuatu
1
in 2025
Gambia rank
1st
Vanuatu rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Gambia
  • Vanuatu
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1 against 1 in Vanuatu, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Vanuatu has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Vanuatu has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Vanuatu Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 1 1 Vanuatu
1990s 0 1 1 Vanuatu
2000s 0 1 1 Vanuatu
2010s 0.2 1 0.8 Vanuatu
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 Vanuatu

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Gambia or Vanuatu?
Gambia, at 1 against 1 in Vanuatu as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Gambia and Vanuatu?
0, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Vanuatu?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Vanuatu rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Gambia ranks 1st and Vanuatu ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.