Gambia vs Paraguay: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Gambia
1
in 2025
Paraguay
1
in 2025
Gambia rank
1st
Paraguay rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Gambia
  • Paraguay
00.20.40.60.81181119182025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1 against 1 in Paraguay, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Paraguay has been ahead every year.

Gambia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Paraguay has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Paraguay Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.7 0.7 Paraguay
2000s 0 1 1 Paraguay
2010s 0.2 1 0.8 Paraguay
2020s 0.8333 1 0.1667 Paraguay

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Gambia or Paraguay?
Gambia, at 1 against 1 in Paraguay as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Gambia and Paraguay?
0, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Paraguay?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Paraguay rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Gambia ranks 1st and Paraguay ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.