Gambia vs Iceland: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Gambia
1
in 2025
Iceland
1
in 2025
Gambia rank
1st
Iceland rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Gambia
- Iceland
How they compare
Gambia currently reports 1 against 1 in Iceland, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Gambia ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Iceland |
| 1910s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1920s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1930s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1940s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1980s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 2000s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Iceland |
| 2010s | 0.2 | 1 | 0.8 | Iceland |
| 2020s | 0.8333 | 1 | 0.1667 | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Gambia or Iceland?
- Gambia, at 1 against 1 in Iceland as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Gambia and Iceland?
- 0, with Gambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Iceland?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Gambia and Iceland rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Gambia ranks 1st and Iceland ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.