Gambia vs Honduras: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Gambia
1
in 2025
Honduras
1
in 2025
Gambia rank
1st
Honduras rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Gambia
  • Honduras
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 1 against 1 in Honduras, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 102 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Honduras ahead.

Gambia ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 12 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 2 and Honduras in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Honduras Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.6 0.6 Honduras
2000s 0 0.9 0.9 Honduras
2010s 0.2 0 0.2 Gambia
2020s 0.8333 0.6667 0.1667 Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Gambia or Honduras?
Gambia, at 1 against 1 in Honduras as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Gambia and Honduras?
0, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Honduras?
102 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Gambia and Honduras rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Gambia ranks 1st and Honduras ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.