Finland vs Gambia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Finland
1
in 2025
Gambia
1
in 2025
Finland rank
1st
Gambia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Finland
  • Gambia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Finland currently reports 1 against 1 in Gambia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Gambia ahead.

Finland ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Finland Gambia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0.2 0 0.2 Finland
1920s 1 0 1 Finland
1930s 1 0 1 Finland
1940s 0.7 0 0.7 Finland
1950s 1 0 1 Finland
1960s 1 0 1 Finland
1970s 1 0 1 Finland
1980s 1 0 1 Finland
1990s 1 0 1 Finland
2000s 1 0 1 Finland
2010s 1 0.2 0.8 Finland
2020s 1 0.8333 0.1667 Finland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Finland or Gambia?
Finland, at 1 against 1 in Gambia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Finland and Gambia?
0, with Finland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Gambia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Finland and Gambia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Finland ranks 1st and Gambia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.