Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Eswatini
0
in 2025
Guinea-Bissau
0
in 2025
Eswatini rank
87th
Guinea-Bissau rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 0 against 0 in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Guinea-Bissau has been ahead every year.
Eswatini ranks 87th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Guinea-Bissau | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2020s | 0 | 0.3333 | 0.3333 | Guinea-Bissau |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
- Eswatini, at 0 against 0 in Guinea-Bissau as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Eswatini ranks 87th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.