Equatorial Guinea vs United Arab Emirates: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2025
United Arab Emirates
0
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
United Arab Emirates rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- United Arab Emirates
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates, a difference of 0.
Across all 55 years both countries report, United Arab Emirates has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | United Arab Emirates | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Equatorial Guinea or United Arab Emirates?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 against 0 in United Arab Emirates as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Equatorial Guinea and United Arab Emirates?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and United Arab Emirates?
- 55 years are reported by both, from 1971 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and United Arab Emirates rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and United Arab Emirates ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.