Equatorial Guinea vs Nicaragua: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Equatorial Guinea
0
in 2025
Nicaragua
0
in 2025
Equatorial Guinea rank
87th
Nicaragua rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Equatorial Guinea
- Nicaragua
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 0 against 0 in Nicaragua, a difference of 0.
Across all 126 years both countries report, Nicaragua has been ahead every year.
Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Nicaragua ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Nicaragua has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Equatorial Guinea | Nicaragua | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Nicaragua |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.7 | 0.7 | Nicaragua |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Equatorial Guinea or Nicaragua?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 0 against 0 in Nicaragua as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 0, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Equatorial Guinea and Nicaragua rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Equatorial Guinea ranks 87th and Nicaragua ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.