Ecuador vs Mauritius: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Ecuador
1
in 2025
Mauritius
1
in 2025
Ecuador rank
1st
Mauritius rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Ecuador
- Mauritius
How they compare
Ecuador currently reports 1 against 1 in Mauritius, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Mauritius ahead.
Ecuador ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Mauritius in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Mauritius | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | Mauritius |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Mauritius |
| 1980s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.6667 | 0.3333 | Ecuador |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Ecuador or Mauritius?
- Ecuador, at 1 against 1 in Mauritius as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Ecuador and Mauritius?
- 0, with Ecuador ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Mauritius?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Ecuador and Mauritius rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Ecuador ranks 1st and Mauritius ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.