Dominican Republic vs Nepal: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Nepal
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Nepal rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Dominican Republic
  • Nepal
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Dominican Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Nepal, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 215 shared years of data; in 1789 it was Nepal ahead.

Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 24 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Dominican Republic Nepal Difference Ahead
1780s 0 0 0 β€”
1790s 0 0 0 β€”
1800s 0 0 0 β€”
1810s 0 0 0 β€”
1820s 0 0 0 β€”
1840s 0 0 0 β€”
1850s 0 0 0 β€”
1860s 0 0 0 β€”
1870s 0 0 0 β€”
1880s 0 0 0 β€”
1890s 0 0 0 β€”
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0.8 0 0.8 Dominican Republic
1990s 0.4 0 0.4 Dominican Republic
2000s 1 0.1 0.9 Dominican Republic
2010s 1 0.8 0.2 Dominican Republic
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Dominican Republic or Nepal?
Dominican Republic, at 1 against 1 in Nepal as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Dominican Republic and Nepal?
0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Nepal?
215 years are reported by both, from 1789 to 2025.
How do Dominican Republic and Nepal rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Nepal ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.