Dominican Republic vs Montenegro: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Montenegro
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic rank
1st
Montenegro rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Dominican Republic
- Montenegro
How they compare
Dominican Republic currently reports 1 against 1 in Montenegro, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 45 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Montenegro ahead.
Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Dominican Republic | Montenegro | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Dominican Republic |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.6 | 0.4 | Dominican Republic |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Dominican Republic |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.8333 | 0.1667 | Dominican Republic |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Dominican Republic or Montenegro?
- Dominican Republic, at 1 against 1 in Montenegro as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Dominican Republic and Montenegro?
- 0, with Dominican Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Dominican Republic and Montenegro?
- 45 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Dominican Republic and Montenegro rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Dominican Republic ranks 1st and Montenegro ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.