Djibouti vs Georgia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Djibouti
0
in 2025
Georgia
0
in 2025
Djibouti rank
87th
Georgia rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Djibouti
  • Georgia
00.20.40.60.81180119132025

How they compare

Djibouti currently reports 0 against 0 in Georgia, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Georgia has been ahead every year.

Djibouti ranks 87th and Georgia ranks 87th of 176 regions.

Georgia has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Djibouti Georgia Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0.4 0.4 Georgia
2010s 0 0.8 0.8 Georgia
2020s 0 0.6667 0.6667 Georgia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Djibouti or Georgia?
Djibouti, at 0 against 0 in Georgia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Djibouti and Georgia?
0, with Djibouti ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Georgia?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Djibouti and Georgia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Djibouti ranks 87th and Georgia ranks 87th of 176 regions.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.