Croatia vs Sri Lanka: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Croatia
1
in 2025
Sri Lanka
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Sri Lanka rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Croatia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was Sri Lanka ahead.
Croatia ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Sri Lanka in 6.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1940s | 0 | 0.2222 | 0.2222 | Sri Lanka |
| 1950s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1960s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1970s | 0 | 1 | 1 | Sri Lanka |
| 1980s | 0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | Sri Lanka |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Sri Lanka |
| 2000s | 1 | 0.3 | 0.7 | Croatia |
| 2010s | 1 | 0.5 | 0.5 | Croatia |
| 2020s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Croatia or Sri Lanka?
- Croatia, at 1 against 1 in Sri Lanka as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 0, with Croatia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Sri Lanka?
- 85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
- How do Croatia and Sri Lanka rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Croatia ranks 1st and Sri Lanka ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.