Croatia vs North Macedonia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Croatia
1
in 2025
North Macedonia
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
North Macedonia rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Croatia
  • North Macedonia
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in North Macedonia, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 85 shared years of data; in 1941 it was North Macedonia ahead.

Croatia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 9 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and North Macedonia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia North Macedonia Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.2 0.2 North Macedonia
2000s 1 0.8 0.2 Croatia
2010s 1 0.4 0.6 Croatia
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Croatia or North Macedonia?
Croatia, at 1 against 1 in North Macedonia as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Croatia and North Macedonia?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and North Macedonia?
85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
How do Croatia and North Macedonia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Croatia ranks 1st and North Macedonia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.