Croatia vs Dominican Republic: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Croatia
1
in 2025
Dominican Republic
1
in 2025
Croatia rank
1st
Dominican Republic rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Croatia
  • Dominican Republic
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Croatia currently reports 1 against 1 in Dominican Republic, a difference of 0.

Across all 85 years both countries report, Dominican Republic has been ahead every year.

Croatia ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Dominican Republic has averaged higher in every one of the 9 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Dominican Republic Difference Ahead
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0.8 0.8 Dominican Republic
1990s 0 0.4 0.4 Dominican Republic
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Croatia or Dominican Republic?
Croatia, at 1 against 1 in Dominican Republic as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Croatia and Dominican Republic?
0, with Croatia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Dominican Republic?
85 years are reported by both, from 1941 to 2025.
How do Croatia and Dominican Republic rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Croatia ranks 1st and Dominican Republic ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.