Cote d'Ivoire vs Mali: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Cote d'Ivoire
0
in 2025
Mali
0
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
87th
Mali rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Mali
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0 against 0 in Mali, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Mali has been ahead every year.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th and Mali ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Mali has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Mali Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0.7 0.7 Mali
2000s 0 1 1 Mali
2010s 0.4 0.8 0.4 Mali
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Cote d'Ivoire or Mali?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0 against 0 in Mali as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Cote d'Ivoire and Mali?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Mali?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Mali rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th and Mali ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.