Cote d'Ivoire vs Madagascar: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Cote d'Ivoire
0
in 2025
Madagascar
0
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
87th
Madagascar rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Cote d'Ivoire
- Madagascar
How they compare
Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0 against 0 in Madagascar, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Madagascar ahead.
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Across the 13 decades both report, Cote d'Ivoire averaged higher in 1 and Madagascar in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cote d'Ivoire | Madagascar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1900s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | Madagascar |
| 2000s | 0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | Madagascar |
| 2010s | 0.4 | 0 | 0.4 | Cote d'Ivoire |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Cote d'Ivoire or Madagascar?
- Cote d'Ivoire, at 0 against 0 in Madagascar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar?
- 0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar?
- 126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
- How do Cote d'Ivoire and Madagascar rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th and Madagascar ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.