Cote d'Ivoire vs Jordan: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Cote d'Ivoire
0
in 2025
Jordan
0
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire rank
87th
Jordan rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Cote d'Ivoire
  • Jordan
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Cote d'Ivoire currently reports 0 against 0 in Jordan, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 104 shared years of data; in 1922 it was Jordan ahead.

Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th and Jordan ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 11 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cote d'Ivoire Jordan Difference Ahead
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0.4 0 0.4 Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Cote d'Ivoire or Jordan?
Cote d'Ivoire, at 0 against 0 in Jordan as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Cote d'Ivoire and Jordan?
0, with Cote d'Ivoire ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cote d'Ivoire and Jordan?
104 years are reported by both, from 1922 to 2025.
How do Cote d'Ivoire and Jordan rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th and Jordan ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.