Costa Rica vs Mongolia: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Mongolia
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Mongolia rank
1st
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Costa Rica
- Mongolia
How they compare
Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Mongolia, a difference of 0.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 115 shared years of data; in 1911 it was Mongolia ahead.
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Costa Rica has averaged higher in every one of the 12 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Costa Rica | Mongolia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1910s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1960s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1970s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1980s | 1 | 0 | 1 | Costa Rica |
| 1990s | 1 | 0.9 | 0.1 | Costa Rica |
| 2000s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 1 | 1 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 1 | 0.8333 | 0.1667 | Costa Rica |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Costa Rica or Mongolia?
- Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Mongolia as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 0, with Costa Rica ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Mongolia?
- 115 years are reported by both, from 1911 to 2025.
- How do Costa Rica and Mongolia rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Costa Rica ranks 1st and Mongolia ranks 1st of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.