Costa Rica vs Malta: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Costa Rica
1
in 2025
Malta
1
in 2025
Costa Rica rank
1st
Malta rank
1st

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Costa Rica
  • Malta
00.20.40.60.81183819312025

How they compare

Costa Rica currently reports 1 against 1 in Malta, a difference of 0.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 126 shared years of data; in 1900 it was Malta ahead.

Costa Rica ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 176 countries.

Across the 13 decades both report, Costa Rica averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Costa Rica Malta Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0.2 0.2 Malta
1950s 1 0.8 0.2 Costa Rica
1960s 1 0.7 0.3 Costa Rica
1970s 1 1 0 β€”
1980s 1 1 0 β€”
1990s 1 1 0 β€”
2000s 1 1 0 β€”
2010s 1 1 0 β€”
2020s 1 1 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Costa Rica or Malta?
Costa Rica, at 1 against 1 in Malta as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Costa Rica and Malta?
0, with Costa Rica ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Costa Rica and Malta?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Costa Rica and Malta rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Costa Rica ranks 1st and Malta ranks 1st of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.