Comoros vs Korea, Dem. People's Rep.: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Comoros
0
in 2025
Korea, Dem. People's Rep.
0
in 2025
Comoros rank
87th
Korea, Dem. People's Rep. rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Comoros
  • Korea, Dem. People's Rep.
00.20.40.60.81178919072025

How they compare

Comoros currently reports 0 against 0 in Korea, Dem. People's Rep., a difference of 0.

Across all 91 years both countries report, Korea, Dem. People's Rep. has been ahead every year.

Comoros ranks 87th and Korea, Dem. People's Rep. ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Head to head by decade

Decade Comoros Korea, Dem. People's Rep. Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0
1910s 0 0 0
1940s 0 0 0
1950s 0 0 0
1960s 0 0 0
1970s 0 0 0
1980s 0 0 0
1990s 0 0 0
2000s 0 0 0
2010s 0 0 0
2020s 0 0 0

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Comoros or Korea, Dem. People's Rep.?
Comoros, at 0 against 0 in Korea, Dem. People's Rep. as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Comoros and Korea, Dem. People's Rep.?
0, with Comoros ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Korea, Dem. People's Rep.?
91 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Comoros and Korea, Dem. People's Rep. rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Comoros ranks 87th and Korea, Dem. People's Rep. ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.