Central African Republic vs Myanmar: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Central African Republic
0
in 2025
Myanmar
0
in 2025
Central African Republic rank
87th
Myanmar rank
87th
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time
- Central African Republic
- Myanmar
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 0 against 0 in Myanmar, a difference of 0.
Across all 106 years both countries report, Myanmar has been ahead every year.
Central African Republic ranks 87th and Myanmar ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Central African Republic | Myanmar | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1920s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1930s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1940s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1950s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1960s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1970s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1980s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 1990s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2000s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2010s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
| 2020s | 0 | 0 | 0 | — |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Central African Republic or Myanmar?
- Central African Republic, at 0 against 0 in Myanmar as of 2025.
- What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Central African Republic and Myanmar?
- 0, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Myanmar?
- 106 years are reported by both, from 1920 to 2025.
- How do Central African Republic and Myanmar rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
- Central African Republic ranks 87th and Myanmar ranks 87th of 176 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.