Cambodia vs Cote d'Ivoire: Meaningful democratic electoral institutions

Cambodia
0
in 2025
Cote d'Ivoire
0
in 2025
Cambodia rank
87th
Cote d'Ivoire rank
87th

Meaningful democratic electoral institutions over time

  • Cambodia
  • Cote d'Ivoire
00.20.40.60.81190019622025

How they compare

Cambodia currently reports 0 against 0 in Cote d'Ivoire, a difference of 0.

Across all 126 years both countries report, Cote d'Ivoire has been ahead every year.

Cambodia ranks 87th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th of 176 countries.

Cote d'Ivoire has averaged higher in every one of the 13 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Cote d'Ivoire Difference Ahead
1900s 0 0 0 β€”
1910s 0 0 0 β€”
1920s 0 0 0 β€”
1930s 0 0 0 β€”
1940s 0 0 0 β€”
1950s 0 0 0 β€”
1960s 0 0 0 β€”
1970s 0 0 0 β€”
1980s 0 0 0 β€”
1990s 0 0 0 β€”
2000s 0 0 0 β€”
2010s 0 0.4 0.4 Cote d'Ivoire
2020s 0 0 0 β€”

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher meaningful democratic electoral institutions, Cambodia or Cote d'Ivoire?
Cambodia, at 0 against 0 in Cote d'Ivoire as of 2025.
What is the difference in meaningful democratic electoral institutions between Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire?
0, with Cambodia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire?
126 years are reported by both, from 1900 to 2025.
How do Cambodia and Cote d'Ivoire rank globally for meaningful democratic electoral institutions?
Cambodia ranks 87th and Cote d'Ivoire ranks 87th of 176 countries.
Where does this data come from?
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data, published as Meaningful democratic electoral institutions. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

About this data

Indicator
Meaningful democratic electoral institutions
Source
V-Dem (2026) – processed by Our World in Data
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Our World in Data)
Coverage
176 places, 29,649 data points, 1789–2025
Last refreshed

Central estimate of whether the country is meaningfully an electoral democracy. This includes the extent to which political leaders are elected under comprehensive suffrage in free and fair elections, and freedoms of association and expression are guaranteed.